Tag Archives: flour-louse

A proof-louse

It stands to reason that a head-louse lives on heads, a plant-louse lives on plants, a bark-louse lives on tree trunks, so a proof-louse occurs on proofs.

Screen Shot 2015-11-03 at 20.07.56

Hopefully not a sign of a lousy book.

This is what crawled over the photocopy proofs of House Guests, House Pests whilst I was reading through them on holiday last week. It’s one of the book/bark/flour lice (order Psocoptera), something like Liposcelis which is often found damaging paper, or in stored food. We have them living in various cupboards in the kitchen and that’s probably where this one came from originally.

However, it had been on a long journey, because it crawled out of the proofs in Strobl, in the Austrian Alps, after I took them from the brown envelop that I had been carrying in my small hand-luggage back-pack.

I suspect my bag, long used on family trips to hold packed lunches, savoury snacks, sweets, and various other food items frequently spilled, has its own internal ecosystem and that there is actually a thriving colony of Liposcelis living at the bottom of it.

I’ll give it a bit of a shake-out before I use it next.


It’s lice Jim, but not as we know it

Tiny specks of creeping animated matter have been living in my kitchen for years. I’ve known vaguely what they were — psochids — but have never really paid them much attention. However, work continues on House Guests, House Pests, and as I weave my way through compiling the ID guide appendix, I feel it incumbent upon myself to have a closer look. I found this one in the bottom drawer of the pull-out larder, grazing on a drift of spilled self-raising flour.

Lepinotus patruelis, bottom drawer of pull-out larder, in spilled flour, 8.i.2013.

A Lepinotus species, but is it a book-louse or a bark-louse?

It’s probably one of the three Lepinotus species recorded as British. It was the National Barkfly Recording Scheme website that first alerted me to its identity. I’ve not had much luck trying to get beyond the genus, the Royal Entomological Society handbook relies on characters on the tiny wing scales, but my specimen is either not quite mature, or has lost them.

Being a synanthropic (domestic) insect, the word ‘barkfly’ seems a bit odd, especially as this species is wingless, and obviously can’t fly. It’s strange how even some biological recording schemes eschew scientific names — ‘The National Psochoptera Recording Scheme’ would have worked for me.

I tried referring to them as ‘book-lice’, but they don’t really live on books either. Even the psochid species recorded in ‘old libraries’ probably don’t eat the books, they most likely gnaw the fungal hyphae of moulds attacking the flour-based pastes and sizes used in traditional bookbinding.

Louse is a fine old word for any small mean creeping thing, and although it has been rather purloined by those ranting on about head lice, there are plenty of other examples including: woodlouse (the familiar domed garden crustaceans), hoglice (freshwater woodlice), fish-lice (flat prawn-like fish parasites), plant-lice (aphids and scale insects), bark-lice (as previously mentioned) run up and down on tree trunks nibbling lichens and mildew and book-lice (on festering tomes in decrepit libraries).

I’m going to coin the name flour-lice. Any objections?